[emlsee]

Do it right Rae88. You don't admire the frog, do you? Makes you feel a touch insecure, left out, lacking in the prince dept? BTW while looking through my Docs, I found some more evidence for the police Rae88. Telecom are tracing the calls you made to my husbands cell phone too. Not the most clever of moves Rae88.

[emelsee]

[Rae88]

Dear Emelsee

Your frog does not worry me in the slightest, he's rather cute. however gave the Constable a hell of a laugh at the Lower Hutt police station at 9 am this morning. As did the rest of your ramblings on here.

The fact is Emelsee, none of the staff at Lower Hutt will admit to ever talking to you, let alone taking a complaint. Checks with telecom and my ISP (Internet Service Provider) have confirmed just which times I was on here, and the impossibility of my being the people you accuse me of. I am not responsible legally or otherwise for what other people put on here.

You are a liar Emelsee, and you have been well and truly caught out, and not by suspicion, or twisting of words, but in fact.

I hope you go to the police and try to make a complaint. They are already familiar with you, and this site, and the fact that you were first to supply my photo and names to others. It was a nice touch removing my photo from your photobucket account, however Photobucket obliged in providing details of your recently deleted photos, and hey presto, there was me. They are completing a search of their other accounts and will provide a list within a few days of others who also have my photo on their a/cs.

I trust you are not as insane as your ramblings on here have been judged by those that viewed them today as being....

I have been advised to tell you the following:

Please remove my names and any references to me from this public site.
Please do not mention me in any manner (including refering to me as Rae88 as you confirmed the link and therefore, legally provided the course for prosecution should you slander that name as well)
Please no not refer to me in any manner again unless you can confirm legally that it was me you were quoting directly and with my permission.
I am not stalking you, I have never even seen your house, your so called phone search (no doubt another of your fantastic lies will confirm I have never dialled your numbers) The police have all my possible phone numbers, should you need them.

The police have not provided you with my address and phone numbers, if you have the correct ones, which I doubt, there is only one person from whom you could have got them. She was told not to pass them on, and in doing so, has also broken privacy laws. You drag others down with you.

You will of course, due to your obsession with me, deny everything written here. Accuse me of lying, and fantasise further to ensure you get the attention you desire from who ever it is you seek it from.

I advise you very strongly against making false statements again on here The times you have used this site and sent messages (thus indicating your other id's) is also available through your ISP provider. As you have broken the law by revealling my name along with my photo without my permission, the police do not need a warrant or such to gain access to that information ......

To put it simply Emelsee, you are in the shit. The depth of which will vary according to what you now decide to do.

You really need to hear the polices opinion of women like you who waste valuable police time by making statements on a public board such as you have.

To the rest of you idiots reading this, be warned, wasting police time with such trival and pathetic stuff such as you have posted on this board was not taken very humourously. Whilst you are keen to blame me for things, you need to be able to prove your accusations. It has been identified exactly which ID's I have used on here, five of you have been wrong 17 times regarding those ID's. That is music you will have to face if you continue.

Right will always prevail over wrong, in this case you were all wrong to carry on something that you have no need to. Some of you have been banned, a few more have either just gone, or will be going from TM. Your gossip, and supicious but bored minds are now without any substance.

Be sure your lies will find you out - and they have Emelsee.

[heeza]

Freaking Nuts

[_rae88_]

What do you take for yours atilasgirl? Horse tranquillisers???

[emelsee]

She-devil can you email your friend rae88 and recommend amytriptelene to her please. If they work for you, they must be good, and rae88 needs all the help she can get.
_________________

[Rae88]

well emelsee
there is no detective in lower hutt, upper hutt, levin, porirua, wellington, wairaparap or kapiti coast that has had a conversation with you regarding me.

This has just been confirmed after I emailed your last nights ramblings.....

Would you like to have another go at putting forward an excuse?

[Rae88]

this just keeps getting better and better .....I wish you'd started your 'legal action' earlier.

[Rae88]

Heres a little sample of just how stupid you are going to look.......

god I'm loving this emelsee, you break the law and have the cheek to try and accuse me.......

God knows what your prosecution evidence will be, but here’s an example of how the defence will go:
Cross examination of Emelsee:

Mrs XXXXX can you please repeat for the Court how you know the defendant personally and where you first met her.

I don’t know her personally and I’ve never met her.

Can you then explain to the Court how you do know the defendant.
Yes, I have seen her post on the trademe message board and the Purple Bunny website as Rae88.

Can you then tell the Court how you know the person posting as Rae88 is infact the defendant.

Because she said so.
Who said so Mrs xxxxx.

Rae88 said she was the person who had been named as blahblahblah


Mrs xxxxxx if the poster called Rae88 told you she was the Queen of England would you believe her.
No, because that’s silly.

Then Mrx xxxxx how do you know the defendant is in fact the same ID as Rae88.
Because she said and I just know she is.
Mrs xxxxx, you have confirmed that you are the poster emelsee on both the Trademe sites and Purple Bunny, is that correct.

Yes,

Do you allow others to know your password and post in your nic name emelsee?
No

Then you can confirm that on such and such dates you called Rae88 a liar and bought into doubt her honesty.

Yes.

Then Mrs xxxxx, how could you be sure that Rae88 was in fact the same person that you said she was.
I couldn’t.

So you agree then Mrs xxxxx, that you had no way of knowing for real who the poster Rae88 was?
Yes,


Mrs xxxxx, as emelsee in trademe did you save to your hard drive a photo off the identity Rae88’s profile?

Yes

Can you please tell the Court why you did that?

Because I thought I knew her.

Did you know her?

No

Then why did you keep the photo on your computer?

I just forgot to delete it (or some other excuse)

Mrs xxxx, did you load this photo onto a facility known as Photobucket that enabled you to post this photo on the Purple Bunny site.

Yes or no (depending on if she’s prepared to lie)
If No

I now produce to the Court evidence from the Purple Bunny site of that photo being posted by Mrs xxxxx who has admitted she is emelsee on that site.

Why did you put the defendents photo along with her name on the purple bunny site which is a publically accessible site?

God knows what you’ll say at that point but it will have to be good!!!

Mrs xxxxx, did you send that photo to other members of the purple bunny community?
Yes,

Why did you that?
I wanted to annoy Rae88 (or whatever)
Why would you want to do that Ms xxxxx?

Because she had me banned from Trademe and ruined the message board.
But Mrs XXX the message board in trademe is still running, can you explain what you mean.
Rae88 kept raving on about a cyber affair and it ruined the conversation in TM.

How did Rae88 do this, did she constantly start threads about the issue?
Yes she did, she always raised the issue and bought it up whenever she could.
Are you sure about that Mrs xxxx?
Ummm, that’s how I remember it.

Ms xxxxx, can you please examine these Trademe threads which have been produced for the Court by Trademe. Can you please read for the court the names and titles of all threads started by Rae88.

Blah blah blah

So Mrs xxxx, it appears that Rae88 was not in the habit of starting threads about the this alleged cyber affair, would you agree.
Blah blah blah.

Mrs xxxxx I put it to you and it appears in those documents that Rae88 only once ever started a thread about that matter, however on many occasions the matter was raised by other posters, yourself included to which Rae88 answered, is that correct?

Yes

Mrs xxxx, do the threads in Trademe appear automatically or do you have to click on them in order to read them.

You click on them and then read through them

So Mrs xxxxx, we can then presume that you voluntarily read any posts made by Rae88.
Yes

But now you state you didn’t like or believe what she was posting?

Yes

Mrs xxxx, why did you continue to read the posting by Rae88 and comment as the text shows, if you did not like the poster or believe her?
Blah blah blah blah
Mrs xxxxx, regarding the alleged cyber affair, were you in anyway involved.
No

Did you have first hand any information about this alleged affair.
No

Were you a participant in this alleged affair?

Certainly not

Then how did you know about this alleged affair?

I read it on the message board.

So you believe everything you read on the message board?

No

Then how did you know that the talk about a cyber affair was true?

I don’t.

And yet Mrs xxxx, you made a judgement against the character of Rae88 based on information you read on these boards that you cannot confirm whether it was true or no? Are you in the habit of repeating hearsay or gossip Mrs xxxxx?
No, ummm Yes and I didn’t like the way she posted and talk about it
But you continued to read her posts?

Yes



You mentioned that Rae88 was responsible for you and others being banned.
Can you explain how this is so, and how you got that information?

She is friends with Jackie the manager of the message boards and she gets Jackie to ban anyone she doesn’t like, she also votes off threads she doesn’t like.
Mrs xxxx, if I told you I am going to call Jackie to the stand who will give evidence that she is not a friend of Rae88’s, has had no contact with her personally out side TM business and that Rae88 was not responsible for your or anyone else being banned, what would you say.
Blah blah blah.

You mentioned Rae88 having threads voted off she does not like. It takes more than ten votes to vote a thread off, is that not right. If so, then how could Rae88 be responsible.

Because she has lots of Tm identities, and gets others to vote.

But if others vote, then that is their decision is it not?

Yes, but she had conned other men by having sex with them into voting and doing what she wanted.
Mrs xxxx, how do you know that? Have one of these men told you that is so?
Well no, but sometimes they called her mistress on the boards and it looked suspicious.

But Mrs xxxx, you have stated that not everything you read on the boards is true and that you believe Rae88 to be untruthful. So what you are saying is you picked and choose what you would and wouldn’t believe? Is that right?
Yes

These other identities you say Rae88 uses, can you tell us what they are?

Suzyq5, Tatlicadi, Makjar, project_hr blah blah blah.

Mrs xxxx, I am about to call to the stand the owners of those identities who can confirm that they have posted under their own identities on the message board. I will also produce evidence of Rae88 being hospitalised and elsewhere at times you and others have accused her of using those identities. Would you like the opportunity to amend your above statement?

Blah blah blah

Mrs xxxx are you aware that every transaction on the internet is linked to an IP, and that every IP can be linked a particular internet service provider, who can identify the owner of that connection?

Mrs xxxx, you have claimed that under several identities on purple bunny the person you know as Rae88 has posted details about your identity and contact details, and has threatened your privacy by making statements about stalking you, is that right?
Yes

Then Mrs xxxxx, how can you account for the fact that those comments were linked to people that do not live within a 100 km distance of Rae88, and further that Rae88 was connected to the internet and posting at the same time with her own ISP in some cases and can be proved in other cases to be no where near a computer?
Mumble mumble
Mrs xxxxx, I put it to you that you were wrong about those identities and that you in fact for some reason known only to yourself immensely disliked Rae88 enough to keep her photo with the intention of exposing her to unwanted publicity at a later date. That later date being when you posted her name and photo together on the Purple Bunny site. And further, that you had no evidence or proof of any sort for believing that Rae88 had harmed you in any manner. What say you?
Ummmm, I just knew it was her, I could tell it was her by the way she posts.
Mrs xxxx, in the transcripts from Tm and Purple Bunny you have accused many identities as being Rae88 and I can produce those people who will say that they were the person that posted those comment and that they are not the poster known as Rae88. Will you now admit that you could have been wrong.

Mrs xxxx I put it to you that you have acted on suspicions alone and have no substance whatsoever to warrant your defamation of the defendants character in the manner in which you have. I’ll ask you again, do you have any solid evidence that the defendant is responsible for the acts you have accused her of, or is of the character you have accused her of being?
Now that answer will be interesting.


Mrs xxxx, are you aware of a poster known as Thewonderstuff.

Yes

Do you know the real name of this poster?

Yes its Cameron Kerr

Did Mr Kerr tell you he used the id Thewonderstuff?

No

Then how did you know that Mr Kerr was that poster?

Blah blah told me

So you knew by hearsay?

Yes

Then Mrs xxxxx, when you posted a photo of Mr Kerr on Purple Bunny and made derogatory comments about his physique, you didn’t actually know for sure that it was the same person that posted as thewonderstuff.
No

But you did it anyway?

Yes

Are you in the habit of posting peoples photos who you aren’t sure exactly who they are and associating them with a real name and discrediting them on the internet Mrs XXXX.

Ummmm, not really.

Mrs xxxxx, presuming you would only post vicious comments about someone you didn’t like, can you please explain to the court why you did not like the poster known as Thewonderstuff.

He never posted proper comments in TM, he always put the word yawnies on threads, and he tormented a friend of mine, Sheeza, about eating KFC. Plus he voted threads off he didn’t like and would defend Rae88.

So Mrs XXX you decided that was reason enough to breach someones privacy and post a photo of someone you believed to be them, along with a name and negative comments about that person. Were you aware at that time your actions were illegal unless you had permission of the person concerned, even if the photo was available on the internet?

Blah blah blah.



Anyway, you get the picture? This is going to be the most fun I've had for ages. My the best 'man' win.

[heeza]

NEWS FLASH

NEWS FLASH

I just rang rae's local police station and I couldn't get any sense out of them so had to hang up.

Once I mentioned Rae's real name, they started laughing and laughing and just would not stop so I had to hang up.

Well, there you go folk, that's what the police think of rae.

Please believe me people. I'm telling the truth too, just like rae is. muahahahahahahaha